| 63 reasons for reading The Machinery of Freedom | 2 0 0 6 |
Nov 05 |
|
Subscribe!
+by RSS+by emailMy Web Apps![]() ![]() -Plbrs: Super Poderes Lexicos -Domburi: Search Super Powers -Uruban: Web Local Other Stuff-KinKey: Painless Accents with a US Keyboard-Toki pona en 76 Lecciones Ilustradas ArchivesList of all posts 667
Random Post!
|
“metaphors”33 posts under this tag.
Remember those classic time-lapseWP videos of fluid cloudscapes and opening flowers? (Or, to be more uptodate, of girls taking a pic of themselves every three years?YT.) Well, this is something similar: Justin FrankelWP, ELZR, Winamp creator and one of this generation’s software virtuosos, spent the better part of a year creating an audio-editing program called Reaper, took pictures as the developement months went by and mashed them together into a webpage. Amazing. (via Justin’s blog: c[a,o]s[a,o][s] de justin)
I can’t remember where I got this notion that Google Finance was just an uninteresting, me-too product1 from Google, but the prejudice set in without my noticing (as, alas, so many do) and it was strong enough that I hadn’t deigned to pay them a visit until I chanced upon them today. Here are some screenshots of both Google Finance and Yahoo Finance (the current king of the hill) set to display Google’s stock information. There’s simply no comparison: Google outshines Yahoo “in approximately the same way that the noonday sun does the stars.”EEM 1 Perhaps it filtered somehow from the popularish blog GigaOM, who to my utter amazement finds Google Finance “downright tiresome and plain ugly.. clearly.. a me-too move.”
Now, of course I had no option but to post a just-found formista quote that links conceptualization and algebra with genius to spare. I’m predictable and then some.
Conceptualization is man’s method of organizing sensory material. To form a concept, one isolates two or more similar concretes from the rest of one’s perceptual field, and integrates them into a single mental unit, symbolized by a word. A concept subsumes an unlimited number of instances: the concretes one isolated, and all others (past, present, and future) which are similar to them.
Similarity is the key to this process. The mind can retain the characteristics of similar concretes without specifying their measurements, which vary from case to case. “A concept is a mental integration of two or more units possessing the same distinguishing characteristic(s), with their particular measurements omitted.”
The basic principle of concept-formation (which states that the omitted measurements must exist in some quantity, but may exist in any quantity) is the equivalent of the basic principle of algebra, which states that algebraic symbols must be given some numerical value, but may be given any value. In this sense and respect, perceptual awareness is the arithmetic, but conceptual awareness is the algebra of cognition.
Ayn Rand, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology
Dr. Leonard Peikoff, The Philosophy of Objectivism: A Brief SummaryPDF
I shall read Ayn Rand soon, I can feel it’s just about the right momement for us to meet. (She surely is one polemical woman: there’s no shortage to people advising you against her and her massive—as in, it has so many damn references (~100) that it needs two-columns for footnotes—↓pedia↓ is currently protected until the bickering quiets down.)
As I mentioned a week ago, I am just starting to feel my way around McKinsey’s Quarterly but it’s been impressive so far. I recently finished reading the three complimentary articles I was granted upon registering (which is free) and they were all remarkable.
Simile is a simple, snappy AJAX timeline from MIT. To keep with the space-time musings of late, it’s a Google Maps for time.
Marketing MyopiaWP, from the recently deceased economist Theodore LevittWP is a fascinating article from 1960. Despite its now quaint and outdated examples, despite being wrong in several of its predictions, this is one of the classic articles of marketing and deservedly so. Perhaps the biggest surpise for me was to reread a sense of marvel and respect at business, a lucid and bracing criticism of capitalism, that I hadn’t seen since I read some Peter DruckerWP last year. The “intellectual” community, specially in Mexico, has so often made deriding business and its babbits its raison d’etre, that I find such cogent analysis incredibly refreshing. Here two fragments:
The difference between marketing and selling is more than semantic.
Selling focuses on the needs of the seller, marketing on the needs of the
buyer. Selling is preoccupied with the seller’s need to convert his product
into cash; marketing with the idea of satisfying the needs of the customer by
means of the product and the whole cluster of things associated with creating,
delivering, and finally consuming it.
In a sense Ford was both the most brilliant and the most senseless marketer in American history. He was senseless
because he refused to give the customer anything but a black car. He was
brilliant because he fashioned a production system designed to fit market
needs. We habitually celebrate him for the wrong reason, his production genius.
His real genius was marketing. We think he was able to cut his selling price
and therefore sell millions of $500 cars because his invention of the assembly
line had reduced the costs. Actually he invented the assembly line because he
had concluded that at $500 he could sell millions of cars. Mass production was
the result, not the cause, of his low prices.
At the end of the article, there’s an equally engaging retrospective commentary fifteen years after. Levitt could write.
Of course, I’d do it again and in the same way, given
my purposes, even with what more I now know—the
good and the bad, the power of facts, and the limits
of rhetoric. If your mission is the moon, you don’t use
a car. Don Marquis’s cockroach, Archy, provides some
final consolation: “An idea is not responsible for who
believes in it.”
As a sidenote, this was an article originally published in the Harvard Business Review, which I’ve always dismissed on the base of its exorbitating price. I’ve been reading through online article abstracts from the current edition and I’m most impressed. I’ll be sure to buy it next time.
Cielo azul, totalmente despejado.
Sí, la histeria colectiva está súper presente en el tema de la muerte. La lágrima colectiva, como ya comienzo a decir. De verdad, la gente llora más porque está junta llorando. Es como un efecto dominó muy loco. Sí, hay que decir por básica decencia, que todo mundo tiene el derecho de vivir su luto como quiera. Sí, no hay nada de nuevo en eso.. Sí, está rico sentir compasión por uno mismo y llorar sabroso con más gente que te da pie a eso. No sé cuánto tiempo esté chida y positiva esa actitud. Llorar sí es positivo, no estoy en contra de ello. De hecho, me gusta llorar. Sólo no estoy de acuerdo en la onda colectiva que parece barril sin fondo. Claramente te pegan la vibra.. La gente va al funeral a llorar y ver llorar. Creo que por eso la gente que no va a llorar, que sólo va a acompañar le han hecho tan difícil esto de dar el pésame. No están en la superficie sicológica para meterse en el llanto colectivo y sienten que traicionan si ríen o simplemente están ahí acompañándote. No, no, no.
Gustavo Muñoz, Clichés para tu luto
I’ve been pretty uncomfortable these days with this blog.
“I remember James Agee who worked in the obituaries at Time magazine for many years said that for a young writer it was always useful to work within the limitation of a form to feel the cage. To feel the burden of that; that I have to be a writer within this formality. “
I understand that and yet I want a change of cage. It may be foolish, but so what? It may not. I want something more à la Gelernter’s information beams. I want my blog to be a stream-of-consciousness. The textstream to the right of this blog has been one of my favorite and most active sections lately but I’m sure most simply miss it. It feels odd there, buried at the side, violating some deep semantic principle, overcrowding the already overcrowded sidebar. I much prefer Kottke’s elegant solution to it: remaindered links. I envision a page with only two vertical sections: the right a weird, tagged aggregator of posts, text scraps, links, and photos, the left the commentstream.These days, even pigeons have blogs. They provide them with electronic recording equipment and their output is automatically fed into a blog. —Wait! Pause for a minute to wonder how profoundly weird that is. Done? Go!— In a way I’m like that, sometimes I’m but a text pigeon, reporting what I find amid the words. And I’m proud of that. Y es que quiero que mi pensamiento deje estelas. Poe’s Murder in the Rue Morgue comes to mind: |
Recent Comments
More »96
|